[ccpw id="5"]

[ccpw id="5"]

HomeFeatureHyperliquid pushes back on FUD over revenue vs. trader focus

Hyperliquid pushes back on FUD over revenue vs. trader focus

-



Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan has addressed criticism, suggesting the platform prioritizes protocol revenue over trader interests.

Summary

  • Jeff Yan says ADL saved traders millions during October 10 market crash.
  • Hyperliquid passed profits to users instead of maximizing protocol revenue.
  • Founder contrasts DeFi onchain transparency with CEX liquidation secrecy.

He also defended the exchange’s auto-deleveraging mechanism during the October 10 market crash.

Yan stated that ADL actions made users “hundreds of millions of dollars” by closing profitable short positions at favorable prices, while the platform’s liquidity pool passed on potential profits to users rather than maximizing its own returns.

The defense comes amid scrutiny of how decentralized perpetual exchanges handle liquidations during volatile market conditions.

Yan emphasized that if more positions had been backstop liquidated, HLP could have made hundreds of millions more in profit, but would have faced irresponsible risk exposure.

He also called the ADL approach a “win-win” that decreased platform exposure.

ADL formula prioritizes simplicity and user understanding

Yan explained that Hyperliquid’s ADL queue follows a similar formula to most centralized exchanges and incorporates both leverage used and unrealized profit on open positions.

Community feedback suggested more sophisticated ADL mechanisms, such as partially offsetting long and short positions in historically correlated assets.

Yan noted that increased complexity could improve performance but questioned whether the benefits merit the added complications.

The founder stated that research is ongoing into whether substantial improvements justify more complex formulas. However, he emphasized that no other major venues use more advanced logic for ADL queues.

Onchain transparency distinguishes DeFi from CEX practices

On October 13, Yan addressed the overall concerns about liquidation reporting by contrasting Hyperliquid’s fully on-chain operations with centralized exchange practices.

Yan called out centralized exchanges for underreporting user liquidations and cited Binance documentation showing that even when thousands of liquidation orders occur in the same second, only one gets reported.

This could be a 100x underreporting under certain conditions when liquidations happen in bursts.

Yan expressed hope that the industry will recognize transparency and neutrality as important features of the new financial system. He also encouraged other platforms to follow Hyperliquid’s approach to verifiable on-chain operations.



LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

LATEST POSTS

The Ultimate Crypto Exchange Face-Off in 2025

When comparing OKX and Bybit, every crypto trader wants to find the most reliable platform for their needs. You might consider factors like security,...

XRP’s Next ‘Face-Melting’ Rally Could Hit Within 6 Weeks—Analyst

Some analysts expect XRP to climb sharply from its current price of $2.39. According to posts on X by a popular analyst known as...

Bitcoin ETFs Amass $524M, Best Day Since $19B Crypto Market Crash

Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) investments are showing signs of recovery, signaling a return of risk appetite following a record crypto market crash in early...

数据:BTC 反弹突破 104000 USDT,24H 涨幅 0.95% – BitRss

The latest Top News, only from Leading exponents of BlockChain, Bitcoin, Altcoins and different...

Most Popular

spot_img